Leitung

Schultze, T., Treffenst?dt, C., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2024). How people use information about the number and distribution of judgments when tapping into the wisdom of the crowds. Decision, 11(1), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000194

Schulz-Hardt, S., Wanzel, S. K., Rollwage, J., Treffenst?dt, C., & Schultze, T. (2022). Do judges prefer advisors with dependent or independent errors? Investigating judges’ advice selection and advice weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151, 1636–1654. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001153

Schultze, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2022). Does change of responsibility reduce escalating commitment? A replication and theoretical extension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 28, 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000366

Rakoczy, H., Miosga, N., & Schultze, T. (2022). Young children evaluate and follow others’ arguments when forming and revising beliefs. Social Development, 31(1), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12533

Schultze, T., & Loschelder, D. D. (2021). How numeric advice precision affects advice taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 34(3), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2211

Schultze, T., Drewes, S., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2021). A test of synergy in dynamic system control tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150, 890–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000975

Mani, N., Schreiner, M. S., Brase, J., K?hler, K., Strassen, K., Postin, D., & Schultze, T. (2021). Sequential Bayes Factor designs in developmental research: Studies on early word learning. Developmental Science, 24(4), e13097. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13097

Lippold, M., Schulz-Hardt, S., & Schultze, T. (2021). G-I transfer in multicue judgment tasks: Discussion improves group members’ knowledge about target relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47, 532–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000947

Jergas, H., Grindeg?rd, L., Schultze, T., Thanarajah, S. E., Kalbe, E., van Eimeren, T., Dafsari, H. S., Dembek, T. A., Visser-Vandewalle, V., Fink, G. R., Timmermann, L., Schilbach, L., & Barbe, M. T. (2021). The impact of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on belief revision and social validation. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 89, 84–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.06.020

Unakafov, A. M., Schultze, T., Gail, A., Moeller, S., Kagan, I., Eule, S., & Wolf, F. (2020). Emergence and suppression of cooperation by action visibility in transparent games. PLOS Computational Biology, 16(1), e1007588. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007588

Skorb, L., ..., Schultze, T., … Hartshorne, J. K. (2020). Many Labs 5: Replication of van Dijk, van Kleef, Steinel, and van Beest (2008). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(3), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920927643

Miosga, N., Schultze, T., Schulz-Hardt, S., & Rakoczy, H. (2020). Selective Social Belief Revision in Young Children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 21(4), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2020.1781127

Hüffmeier, J., Stern, J., & Schultze, T. (2020). When mistakes affecting one’s own group result in compensation: Evidence of a compensatory own goal effect. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 48, 101633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101633

Ebersole, C. R., ..., Schultze, T., ... Nosek, B. A. (2020). Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(3), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920958687

Schultze, T., Mojzisch, A., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2019). Why dyads heed advice less than individuals do. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(3), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500004381

Gerlach, T. M., Arslan, R. C., Schultze, T., Reinhard, S. K., & Penke, L. (2019). Predictive validity and adjustment of ideal partner preferences across the transition into romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000170

Schultze, T., Gerlach, T. M., & Rittich, J. C. (2018). Some People Heed Advice Less than Others: Agency (but Not Communion) Predicts Advice Taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31(3), 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2065

Wanzel, S. K., Schultze, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2017). Disentangling the effects of advisor consensus and advice proximity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 1669–1675. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000396

Stern, A., Schultze, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2017). How Much Group is Necessary? Group-To-Individual Transfer in Estimation Tasks. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.95

Schultze, T., Mojzisch, A., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2017). On the Inability to Ignore Useless Advice. Experimental Psychology, 64(3), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000361

Hofheinz, C., Germar, M., Schultze, T., Michalak, J., & Mojzisch, A. (2017). Are Depressed People More or Less Susceptible to Informational Social Influence? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 41(5), 699–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-017-9848-7

Mojzisch, A., Schultze, T., Hüffmeier, J., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2016). Differentiation of selves: Differentiating a fuzzy concept. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15001478

Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009

Schultze, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2015). The impact of biased information and corresponding meta-information on escalating commitment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 49, 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.05.005

Schultze, T., Rakotoarisoa, A.-F., & Stefan, S.-H. (2015). Effects of distance between initial estimates and advice on advice utilization. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(2), 144–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500003922

Rakoczy, H., Ehrling, C., Harris, P. L., & Schultze, T. (2015). Young children heed advice selectively. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 138, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.04.007

Ehrling, C., & Schultze, T. (2015). Von Stuttgart 21, Berlins Flughafen und Sydneys Opernhaus. https://publications.goettingen-research-online.de/handle/2/68677

Bednarik, P., & Schultze, T. (2015). The effectiveness of imperfect weighting in advice taking. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(3), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500004666

Mojzisch, A., Krumm, S., & Schultze, T. (2014). Do High Working Memory Groups Perform Better? Journal of Personnel Psychology, 13(3), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000111

H?usser, J. A., Schulz-Hardt, S., Schultze, T., Tomaschek, A., & Mojzisch, A. (2014). Experimental evidence for the effects of task repetitiveness on mental strain and objective work performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(5), 705–721. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1920

Schultze, T., Mojzisch, A., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2013). Groups Weight Outside Information Less Than Individuals Do Because They Should: Response to Minson and Mueller (2012). Psychological Science, 24(7), 1371–1372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612472206

Schilbach, L., Eickhoff, S. B., Schultze, T., Mojzisch, A., & Vogeley, K. (2013). To you I am listening: Perceived competence of advisors influences judgment and decision-making via recruitment of the amygdala. Social Neuroscience, 8(3), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2013.775967

Schultze, T., Pfeiffer, F., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2012). Biased information processing in the escalation paradigm: Information search and information evaluation as potential mediators of escalating commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024739

Schultze, T., Mojzisch, A., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2012). Why groups perform better than individuals at quantitative judgment tasks: Group-to-individual transfer as an alternative to differential weighting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.12.006